Garmin calories burned reddit. There's no way the Garmin numbers are correct.
Garmin calories burned reddit. I’ve been comparing my Vivosport with my Apple Watch 6 over the past week. Dec 4, 2023 · How Accurate is Garmin Calorie Burn Reddit Forum Discussion. I have forerunner 235, and measuring my daily calories since past 2 weeks, every day my total calories burn shows up around 3500-4000 cal which includes active calories of 1700-2200 daily. It pushes the data to Myfitnesspal as two separate values if I exercise. BUT, any activity I do on top of that is also calculated into my calories burned. I have found abundant content on how the Instinct 2 Solar, Forerunner 265 and Fenix 7 are great for backpacking and running. I'd rather just see whatever Garmin's calories burned estimate is. Average heart rate was within 3bpm between Garmin and Concept2 for the duration of the row, yet Garmin FENIX 7 estimates half the calories burned. Why are people so interested in this? Because we know that: no brand including Garmin can accurately track energy expenditure [1, 2] I use a Garmin Fenix 5; and often it feels like no matter how hard I work in a workout I never burn over 400 calories!! I was working out for an hour today at a 139bpm average heart rate (52kg), and it said I only burned 290 calories. I use the Garmin Fenix 5X for the map functionality, and syncing to Strava. This subreddit is an unofficial, non-affiliated community, run by the users, to embrace and have conversation about the products we love! As for the precision, I have been very impressed comparing the watch's calories burned to my personal experience when tracking calories. Manually tracked is easy - basically any acitvity you track (note the summary for an activity shows total calorie burn i. Does anybody know why it may say that, or if it actually is true? The Garmin always shows ridiculously high calorie burns. I already had the Garmin scales for weight tracking. My workout was an average of 170w with average speed around 29km/h. This will impact your estimated calorie burn. A 4 miles run yesterday and a 3200yard swim today. You don't burn 400 calories in half an hour on a leisurely ride. So am I right in saying Garmin calculates my calories burned as BMR+Sedentary+Activity? I always thought TDEE was calculated as BMR + Activity. Is Garmin According to MyFitnessPal I'm at 2200 calories for today but I burned 800 calories which is being pushed by Garmin. 4kg), running 6mph for 57 minutes, and female, you get slightly different values depending on age: 20: 522, 30: 503, 40 I just got a Forerunner 45 and I use it to track how many calories I burn throughout the day. Does anyone have insight to how accurate or reliable these figures are? Of course the local nutrition stores as well as online calculators etc all say my daily calorie burn should be 2,500-3,000. For example, today I didn't have a lot of time, but was able to squeeze in 30 minutes of zone 2 the Garmin says that was 400+ calories (Strava says ~140). I don't know if Garmin over-estimates calories burn or if I under-estimate my food intake, but I usually finish the day with 300kcal left to eat and I'm still maintaining. As a watch your Garmin will calculate calories burned based on your heart rate and your body data (height, weight etc). I did not have my phone on me during my exercise. . So when I run, I see that I have a step bonus plus a run bonus. It always seemed to me like it was overestimating the amount I burn, especially when I'm sitting on the couch. It’s not 100% accurate but it’s a good starting point for you to gauge yourself. 24/7 resting burn plus total active) and has a widget page that splits out total I just unlinked the MFP app from Garmin Connect. I wanted to maintain my weight. A watts to calories calculator online tells me that is 918 calories, which is quite different to the watch but also not a million miles away. Anyone else get these weird change in calorie values? Yesterday walked 4497 steps and myfitnesspal says i burned 1487 calories. I started my journey out at 360 (ish) pounds and am now down to around 235. I had 2200 calories burned for 47 miles with less than 1000 feet of elevation over 3 hours. The images are the data for my day that it collected. 9lbs Hey! I have a question about the Garmin watch, wearing it and Calorie burn. Hi! Garmin bases a lot of his calorie estimation on VO2Max and that, in turn, has a heavy dependency on the max heart rate. Calories Burned Calculator -- If you put in 120lb (54. Some minutes later, already awake but still on the couch, the calories burned had risen to 1143, with only 12 minutes of activity and 9602 steps. I have observed the same behavior on a 120 miler with 4700 calories burned. Your estimated calories burn should be your sedentary calories goal + any activity you do. I turned off the watch and turned it on again. I am a 41 year old male trying to get in better shape after a recent cancer scare. That puts me at a net of 1600 calories. I did maintainbut I also ended up losing my period for 4 months and was hungry all the time. The Apple Watch generally is very good at estimating the calories that you burn. It started at 500 calories. If your max heart rate is set low Garmin will overestimate your calories. Reddit and elsewhere is regularly getting flooded by posts about tracking calories burned. So if you track what your Garmin says you burn vs what you eat (which also isn't necessarily going to be accurate because labels can legally be wrong by X%) and then track the difference vs your weight loss over time. Garmin is fairly accurate at estimating calories being "burned", straight from Garmin's site: Active calorie numbers are what is burned throughout the day only while doing physical, non-sedentary activities such as walking or working out. My calories burned seem right for everything excepting strength, but especially cardio. The Reddit discussion revolves around the accuracy of Garmin watches in calculating calorie burn Recently I’ve noticed that my calorie burn has been 100-200 calories higher than in the past, even though I’m doing the same type of workout for the same length of time. 1:30 moving time, 155 average HR, and it shows 702 calories burned. I didn’t use my HRM for either but my Fenix 7X will track my HR while swimming, which is cool, so they both probably used those values. The Garmin calculates it all as one value, calories out. Today I swam 1700 yards in 43 minutes, heart rate around 150. Whereas garmin watches have continuous HR so its active burn consists of manually tracked ative burn and additional active burn. It's not going to be particularly accurate, but I do feel like it's relatively consistent at least. And then I can subtract my daily intake from my fitness pal. For reference, I do 30-40 strength training then a 5 mile run. But 5. This subreddit is an unofficial, non-affiliated community, run by the users, to embrace and have conversation about the products we love! Calorie widget on the watch will show total active and Total (resting total - active - note I could be wrong on this as been a while since seen the old calorie screens - as Epix splits out total active, resting, total and gives a projected total estimate (i. Active calories are effectively made up of two types but most garmin models, the app and the web just show/report it as Active caloires: 1) manually tracked calories - when you do an activity based on the activity MET calorie value, how intense it was you get a value of burned calories. Make sure you have updated your weight (and possibly height) in your Garmin app. I'm 5'6 147lb. I would expect this run to be more like 1200 calories burned, and when I run on the treadmill with BW entered it tends to give estimates more in this range of 120 cal/mi instead of 90/mi which is a huge difference. If you sync with MyFitnessPal, it'll update your daily totals on MFP with that information. Hi everyone, I’m currently in the process of deciding which Garmin watch to buy. Today I did 8366 steps and its at 462 burned. Do also be aware it is Total calories burned not Extra, so it is including let's say 80 calories per hour your body would have burned anyway. e. I'm thinking of getting the HR monitor and cadence just so I can be a little Moreno scientific about my riding. Total calories is the sum of active calories (the calories that you burn by doing a workout or activity) and resting calories (the calories that you burn by staying alive). I so far am loving it. All other metrics collected by the FENIX7 were accurate, to include stroke rate, distance covered, 500m split pace, and power. Garmin thinks I I am usually at like 35-38kms/h when it's flat, probably would be at about the same speed and doing the same effort with a normal bike. This subreddit is an unofficial, non-affiliated community, run by the users, to embrace and have conversation about the products we love! I just wanted to come here and say that I ate exactly what my garmin said for calories burned for my resting + running. If I go for a run or workout without turning on the activity mode on my Garmin (Instinct), will calories burned be the same as if I didn’t have that… Calories burned in 30 minutes for people of three different weights - Harvard Health This source suggests that running 6mph for a 125lb person will burn about 495 calories. After saving the activity, the total of calories burned are 681. The only data I have given it is my weight. The only thing that’s changed is I’ve been working out a little less the past few months bc life’s been busy. It just sounds way too good to be true. My Apple Watch says I burned 402 calories This website says 502 calories… How many calories are burned walking an hour? As a general rule of thumb, calories burned walking 1 hour ranges between 280 and 500 calories per hour, which is awesome. If you workout harder or longer than I do then it's very doable. I recently started logging exercises and was curious how accurate the calories burned metric is. Today I was playing paddle and before ending the activity I saw that I'd burned 500 calories. I have a Garmin Forerunner 235 that is a few years old and it has suddenly started counting about 1/3 fewer calories burned during workouts than similar ones. Based on my experience and assuming you are obviously very fit (not knowing how much weight you were carrying on a back pack) maybe a 10 to 15lb load, your calorie burn ratio should come r/Garmin is the community to discuss and share everything and anything related to Garmin. Which after looking at it's impossible. This subreddit is an unofficial, non-affiliated community, run by the users, to embrace and have conversation about the products we love! I'm your age but much shorter and lighter, my sedentary calorie intake is estimated by Garmin at 1950, which corresponds to values from my dietician. Does that mean I only burned that much or is 500 calories burned on 1hr of doing it anyway? r/Garmin is the community to discuss and share everything and anything related to Garmin. I'm wondering, how accurate is Garmin's calories tracking? I'm wondering if I'm in a too large of a calories In other words, if Polar shows you burned 20% more calories today than yesterday, it's probably a good chance Garmin also will show you burned 20% more calories today than yesterday. Accuracy of this method has its May 2, 2015 · I use the Garmin Edge 200 to record the route, distance and speed of my rides. In a 30 minute, high intensity elliptical session last night - it said I burned 100 calories My HR was at 130 through 165 for 30 minutes that should have been closer to 350 / 400 for my age and size no? I used an online heart rate based calorie burn calculator to compare and even the net calories burned is 903 calories, much higher than the 744 from Garmin. If I run 5 miles (~10,000 steps) it now says I burned the calories from the run AND however many calories I would burn if I just walked 10,000 steps. There's no way the Garmin numbers are correct. I can't test the effects any better than by measuring mass/weight, which is a very noisy measurement, so I can't vouch for daily accuracy but I can very confidently say the average reading is spot on. But that's been my experience too, sometimes it seems way high. If you have a step exercise row in your diary, and it shows a step count but 0 calories, then MFP has already estimated your calorie burn to be the same or greater than what Garmin is telling it you have burnt today and you have negative calorie adjustment turned off. The whoop isn’t synced to Strava so is just my daily health monitor. You should if using it start out conservative and assume maybe 60-70% are real. It isn't giving me the calories twice, it is itemizing it for the purposes of tracking on MFP. 5k calories The 255 will track calories burned if you wear it all day, and display it on the watch and the Garmin Connect app/site. Anything referring to calories from these devices is derived from an algorithm and so only an estimate, aka best guess. The raw numbers may be 2000/2200 and 1800/1960 respectively in the different systems, but the relative changes are really what matter. Regularly update your weight in Garmin connect if you’re not doing so already. When the active calories are less than 2000 it will give me a bonus equal to the number displayed but when it is any multiple of 2000 it will reset to a number under the multiple of 2000. Not just distance and elevation, pace, height, weight, fitness level, load carried etc. Today my watch has claimed that I burned 1000 calories by just walking 6000 steps while at work. On my workout days I burn around 3200 calories. I just came back from a 5k walk with the dog, my Garmin is saying 510 calories - whereas whoop reckons 234 (which I suspect is more accurate given that it was not a very strenuous walk). Yesterday all i was doing was sit at conference rooms from 9 to 5 with a bit of going up stairs and it shows that i burned 2748 calories that day, 2200 resting nad 528 active. My main objective with the watch is to have accurate estimates of calorie burn, GPS tracking for backpacking and workout planning. My Garmin and Strava displayed the same exact number for calories burned for my last two activities. The resting portion of the calories is just a plain BMR/TDEE equation. I’m trying to burn more calories than consumed (on a caloric deficit) and so I used the stationary bike for an hour and the number only went down to 210 calories. Heavier loads require more calories! Your actual weight may have stalled since you are weight training. I agree with your assessment. Including my run I'm at 12k steps today. For the entire month of January I wore it daily, and tracked every single calorie I ate with a food scale. Smartwatches, like Garmin’s, use the personal information you provide plus your heart rate and speed of the activity (for exercise like running or walking). I am also very meticulous about calories burned. So a run that burns 500 calories plus my BMR (1500) calories would give me 2000 calories burned for the day. I find I consistently need around 150 - 300 more calories than it says. From Jan 1 - Jan 31 I: Consumed 52,054 calories Burned 79,930 calories Net: 27,876, divided by 3,500 for each pound = 7. So yesterday I ran 4 miles and my Forerunner 965 shows that I burned 466 calories, and today I just ran 8 miles and its showing I only burned 37… Skip to main content Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home Hi, I recently got a Fenix 7 and I am struggling to determine whether I can trust the calories burned data or not. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now I did a 5 mile run and a CrossFit workout and it thinks I burned over 5000 calories. After the 23-minute nap, the calories burned were 1050, although the watch even had detected the nap. I have my calorie adjustment set the Garmin Connect, however, it is only shows iPhone step tracking. It also gives me a prediction of the amount of calories I have burned on any particular ride. If you’re loading properly, it’s likely that you are gaining muscle. Aug 29, 2024 · I have a VERY active job that consists of a mix of running and walking for 12 hours a day, averaging 30,000-40,000 steps a day. At no time is Garmin, Apple or any other device measuring heat output from calories burned. I feel that as the calories burned take my heart rate into account, it's probably not that off. Wearing both on my runs, and checking sleep stats etc. Hi, I've one question. active + resting - to see the active portion go into activity, stats page and go to hydration That's exactly what I ended up doing. r/Garmin is the community to discuss and share everything and anything related to Garmin. It only gave me a calorie bonus of 700. Ever since, Garmin has been double counting steps and activities. I get some crazy high numbers on my calorie count when I use my Garmin. Note: if you want to know the amount of calories burned walking per minute, divide the above figures by 60. I feel like it gets too sloppy with numbers when it tries to do the active calories or your "allowed to eat" allotment cause you exercised today. Yesterday ran 10 miles around 8:40 per mile pace and the calories burned was 912. Moreover, you're not burning that many calories during lifting to need to account for them. This thread is archived New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast Before the nap my active calories were about 140. Calories are units of heat burned in the production of energy. The Garmin watch cannot even close to accurately estimate calories burned for lifting because heart rate while lifting is not as correlated with energy output as it is with steady state cardio. Over the last year its been a great help in losing weight, but there are… I got the Epix 2 this past week and quickly realized it’s saying I burn around 3,800 calories on non workout days and 4,800 on the days I workout. I am doing around 12000 steps + 1 hour of strength exercise daily. My pulse is usually around 100-120 when I work. My device and app are all up to date, my HR monitor is no different than before and is connecting just fine. During an hour of lifting/ strength I burn 500-600 kcal, a bit more for running, which seems right. They’re both very very close, for example active calories are within 20 on a 30 minute run. I just can’t imagine that near 23000 steps, a workout, and a slight bit of high intensity cardio only burned 623 calories on top of my BMR. Or if your VO2Max is detected low Garmin will also overestimate your calories. The real difference is that I get much less tired and go faster on hills. A lot factors go into that calculation. Today during lunch time took some walks. My Fitness Pal should be taking data from Garmin Connect, however, yesterday I burned 680 calories that My Fitness Pal is not showing. vubp wlx efhyh qmwxtk csm bfgzry scqg imbao vasxal stbft